Home Blog Page 47

Effective Communication in Turbulent Times

0
Joe Donovan
Founding Partner
The Donovan Group

March 11, 2020. It’s a date many of us will remember as when the pandemic became very real for most of us. While some schools in the United States had already closed, the vast majority at that time were still operating as usual. But on March 11, the World Health Organization officially declared COVID-19 a pandemic. 

The rest, of course, is history. 

While we can generally think of March 2020 as when the pandemic began, it has been more difficult for us to point to a date or a set of dates and say: “This was when the pandemic ended.”

We can never take lightly the devastation the pandemic has caused. We all know people—perhaps several—who were lost or severely impacted by COVID-19. Many of our students, especially our most vulnerable, have suffered greatly over the past two years. 

However, for the most part, we can take a breath and say: “We did it. We made it through.”

At this moment, it can be hard to take stock. The past two-plus years have been disorienting, to say the least. It’s fair to look back at March 2020 and the subsequent years and think, “What Just happened?”

Last winter, I fell on the ice while making my way to the car after grocery shopping. It was one of those falls I didn’t see coming. One moment I was walking to my car, thinking about all the things on my to-do list, and the next, I was looking straight up at the cold, blue sky.  

As I lay on the ground, trying to assess my situation, I did something of a systems check. Did I hit my head? Did I break any bones? My hand hurt, but I wasn’t bleeding. As people approached and asked if I was OK, I said, “Yeah, I’m OK.” But in truth, at the moment, I wasn’t quite sure. I was a little stunned.

As we emerge from the pandemic, we may find ourselves in the same disoriented state regarding our schools. While every school and district leader is owed a debt of gratitude from their community for handling the challenges of the pandemic, it is difficult to know where our schools stand with the public. 

This situation is made more difficult because of all the turbulence in the world right now, much of it also brought on by the pandemic itself. 

So…are we OK? 

Taking stock of our situation

While every school district is different, there are many things to be concerned about as we emerge from the pandemic. We hear from school and district leaders that the turbulence from the pandemic has turned into anger on the part of some in the community. This has led to protests and a hardening of positions. We know that our staff is tired and that, like so many of us, school board members are getting more than they could have expected. And, the needs of our students have shifted as the pandemic laid bare some of the inequities we see among children. 

Taken together, one of the simplest ways to describe what we are seeing now is that people are hurting. 

It is in the context of all this turbulence that some recent polling has shed light on this situation. According to Gallup in 2021, 73 percent of parents of school-aged children say they are “satisfied with the quality of education their oldest child is receiving.” Perhaps more interesting is that more parents were more satisfied in 2021 than in 2013 or 2002. 

While this is down from the high point of 82 percent satisfaction in 2019, it is clear that people are generally happy with their schools. 

This is where things get interesting. According to the New York Times and other media outlets, whose reporters went deep into the Gallup data, those who are most intimately engaged in the public schools (notably parents) have strong positive feelings about their schools. Those who do not—specifically, those who do not have children in the schools—are far more negative. 

Overall, considering parents and non-parents together, only 46 percent of Americans are satisfied with schools. This may be surprising on the surface, but in many ways, these data reveal what we have known for years: those who are closest to the schools most often have more positive feelings about our schools than others. 

So, what do we do with this information? 

For many of us, these data give us solace in knowing that what was true before the pandemic is true now. To know schools is to like them. However, we also know that as we pick ourselves up and move forward, much work remains. 

Our work has always been challenging. It’s even more so now. We have an opportunity and an opportunity to provide value through effective communication. 

None of us had a ready-made playbook about how to operate in a post-pandemic world, which means we are now reorienting ourselves. We are catching our breath. We are assessing our situation. But we have a sense that what has worked in the past will continue to work as we move forward.

Always seek the high ground

In all they do, education leaders must seek to be the most professional, reasonable, and thoughtful people in the room. 

Continue to act based on your principles as an educational leader and the principles of your organization. Focus on honesty, transparency, and forthrightness. Understand the responsibility you have in providing stakeholders—including staff, students, parents, other community residents, and area businesses—insights into the outstanding value public schools provide.

Always remember that your ethics, professionalism, and values are your superpowers. Take the high ground. 

Focus on good governance

In all things, show that your school district operates with good governance structures. Maintain transparency and ensure good clear delineation between what is a district communication and what is a school board communication. 

When it is difficult to communicate about specific situations, perhaps because of the need to protect students or staff and their confidentiality, consider speaking instead about what we call the “3Ps”: Policy, process and procedure. 

Finally, continue to recognize that, in most communities, upwards of 80 percent of community residents do not have children in the schools and may not be meaningfully engaged with the school district. Seek ways to connect with those residents, especially during times of turbulence.

Remember, you are not a board member

One of the most difficult situations we face is when people try to leverage board members against the superintendent and other school leaders. This is often done during open board meetings, when board members cannot defend themselves. We find that board members often fail to recognize that their superintendent and other school leaders, despite their skill and experience, do not have a board vote.

With that, we must remember that there will be times when administrators cannot defend themselves. The school board must defend its administrators and the role of the administrators in these situations. 

Explain the ‘why’

Leading requires providing a clear path forward and anticipating and addressing challenges with a commitment to achieve an objective. We must explain the what, how, and when. But we really need to lean into the why. This is especially important now as we come out of the pandemic and school districts continue their efforts to meet the needs of all students, including those most impacted by the pandemic. 

We find that people often debate the what, when, and how, but often find agreement on the why

Tell your story

Much of what I love about working in public education is that I know small miracles take place in classrooms every day. The amazing efforts that school district staff make to meet the needs of students, to kindle that spark of curiosity and to protect students never fail to inspire me. I bet the same is true for you. Tell those stories. 

Remember, if you do not tell those stories about your district’s efforts to meet the needs of students, no one will. Consider making it your daily goal to consider three things that you believe everyone should know about your school district, such as compelling stories of success. Tell those stories to everyone who will listen. Your enthusiasm for your school district is a secret weapon. Use it. 

As we reflect on what has likely been the most difficult two school years of our careers and prepare for a new school year this fall, remember that while our worlds have changed, much of what made us successful as it relates to our communications and community engagement remains. Here’s to a great winter and rest of the year! 

Joe Donovan

Joe is the founding partner of the Donovan Group, a communications firm that services public schools in Minnesota. 

Schools should prepare now to apply for new energy infrastructure grants from the Energy Department

0

Lori Volz
Director
Baker Tilly

In the fall of 2022, the application process will open for public K-12 schools to apply for energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements grants from a new Department of Energy (DOE) program. DOE will be offering $500 million under a competitive grant program included as Section 40541 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). This competitive grant program will be open from 2022 to 2026, or until all funds have been expended.

According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, 53% of public school districts report the need to update or replace multiple building systems, including HVAC systems. Energy consumption is the second-highest operational expense schools face (after salaries and compensation) with a significant portion of energy lost through school walls and windows, and because of other inefficient equipment and systems.

Grant eligibility

Eligible entities for the grants include a combination of a local educational agency (like a school district) or other organization with the knowledge and capacity to partner and assist with energy improvements.

Projects eligible for grants include energy improvements or renovations to a school that result in a direct reduction in school energy costs. This may mean improvements to the air conditioning, ventilation, heating, domestic hot water heating, compressed air, distribution, lighting or power systems, as well as to controls of a building. Eligible projects also include any improvements or renovations in a school that lead to an improvement in teacher and student health, saves energy or involves the installation of renewable energy technologies.

Grants can also be used for the installation of alternative fueled vehicle infrastructure on school grounds for:

  • exclusive use of school buses, school fleets, or students;
  • the general public; and
  • the purchase or lease of alternative fueled vehicles to be used by a school

Competitive criteria

In awarding grants, the DOE shall give priority to schools:

  • with renovation, repair, and improvement funding needs
  • with a high percentage of students who are eligible for a free or reduced price lunch, or
  • that leverages private sector investment through energy-related performance contracting

In considering grant applications, DOE also will consider the extent of the disparity between the fiscal capacity of a school to carry out energy improvements and the needs of the partnering local educational agency for those energy improvements. It also will consider the likelihood that the school that is the subject of improvements is maintained in good condition, as well as the potential energy efficiency and safety benefits from the proposed energy improvements.

According to DOE guidance, only local educational agencies and public schools are eligible entities for funding; private schools are not eligible.

Get ready to apply

Keeping in mind that this is a competitive grant program, here are key steps schools should take to present the best case for funding:

  • Prepare a facility assessment. This likely will require engaging with a local architect, HVAC contractor or energy consultant to conduct an in-depth assessment of all school buildings to identify items that would qualify for an energy grant under this program.
  • Assess free lunch population. Since one of the grant considerations is the percentage of students who are eligible for a free or reduced price lunch, schools should make sure this information is accurate and up to date.
  • Take advantage of electric vehicle demand. In school districts in regions where demand for and use of electric and other alternative-fueled vehicles is high, installing charging stations or related infrastructure can serve a couple of purposes. It can create more positive ties between the school and the community. It can also serve as an incentive for teachers and other employees to work at that school.
  • Prepare for the application process. The DOE anticipates that the application process will open in late fall 2022; check eere-exchange.energy.gov for announcements and guidance on the process. Schools should be prepared to register with the proper government portals so they can be submit their completed grant application as soon as possible after the process opens.
  • Use data to your advantage. Since this is a competitive grant, schools should be prepared to support their grant applications with specific data related to the expected energy savings, increased energy efficiency, numbers of people who can access new electric car charging stations, percentage of students eligible for free or reduced lunch, and other related data.

2023 Legislative Platform

0

2023 MASA Legislative Platform
The Board of Directors met December 7, and approved the 2023 MASA Legislative Platform.  We are grateful for member input and the work of the Legislative Committee under the leadership of Superintendents Kim Hiel and Jason Berg.

The platform will serve as the basis of our advocacy efforts. MASA Lobbyist, Valerie Dosland, and Deb Henton will share the platform with legislators and key opinion leaders as we work hard to advance solutions to meet our E-12 needs!

View the platform here!


2023 MASA Legislative Platform & Priorities

The Minnesota Association of School Administrators (MASA) believes a fully funded, equitable education system is needed to support all students with the opportunity for educational success.

Two funding streams provide the foundation for school district finances – the basic formula allowance and special education funding. Both funding streams are woefully underfunded – the basic formula allowance has not kept up with inflation, and the special education cross-subsidy continues to grow.

For the 2023 legislative session, we urge the governor and the legislature to prioritize education funding and swiftly pass an education funding bill early in the session that:
  • Increases the basic formula allowance by 5% per year for the next two years and links future increases to inflation
  • Fully funds the special education cross-subsidy
Stable and predictable school funding

  • Increase the Local Optional Revenue (LOR) and equalization of various levies
  • Fully fund the English Learner program
  • Link categorical funding streams to the basic formula allowance
  • Establish a per-pupil funding formula for school based early learning programs
  • Allow school boards to renew existing operating referenda
  • Explore new application and eligibility processes for free and reduced-price lunch

Address barriers to teaching and expand the teaching workforce

  • Expand funding for new teacher and Grow Your Own initiatives and provide financial support for student teachers
  • Allow broad teacher licensure, especially in science, special education, middle school, and school social work licensure areas
  • Increase flexibility for the out-of-state license reciprocity process, including removing testing barriers
  • Provide more options for school districts to hire short-call substitutes
  • Improve pension benefits

Support local control

  • Fund existing mandates and oppose new unfunded mandates
  • Require teachers who leave to teach in another school district during the middle of their contract to disclose this information

Safe and supportive schools

  • Increase safe schools funding to $100 per pupil to support student mental health and increase the number of student support personnel professionals
  • Expand safe schools funding to all cooperative school districts
  • Establish a minimum level of $100,000 per school district to ensure school districts receive adequate funding
  • Allow school districts to use safe schools funding to increase cyber security efforts, update technology systems, and cover increasing insurance costs

Create flexible learning environments

  • Give school districts the option to adapt learning environments by allowing the flexibility to move away from seat time and towards competency-based education
  • Permit school districts to determine their school calendars

Remove barriers to improving school facilities and student transportation

  • Expand the eligible uses of Long-Term Facilities Maintenance Revenue and remove funding caps
  • Reduce unnecessary and outdated requirements for school bus driver’s licenses
  • Expand lifetime use of Type III vehicles

The Minnesota Government Data Practices Act Now Regulates How School Districts Can Monitor Student Computer Activity

0

Alex D. Ivan
Education Law Attorney
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered

Given widespread concerns related to school shootings and student mental health, many school districts have sought to proactively identify student safety threats by contracting with third-party vendors for the use of software that continuously monitors students’ use of district-owned devices, district-issued student email accounts, and in some case students’ public social media accounts or blog streams. Using complex algorithms, the software attempts to identify potential threats in the areas of security, public safety, harm, wellness, or acts of violence, and sends alerts to authorized district users for any appropriate response.

Though these measures can help school officials address safety concerns before harmful conduct occurs, their effectiveness is a matter of some controversy. Some argue the software does more harm than good by discriminatorily flagging language more commonly used by LGBTQ+ students or racial minorities, or by deterring students in need of mental health or other support from searching for resources due to concerns about the lack of privacy.

The Minnesota State Legislature apparently noticed these concerns, because one of the few bi-partisan accomplishments during the 2022 General Session included an amendment to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (“MGDPA”), Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13. In part, the new provisions require technology providers who contract with school districts to be subject to data privacy restrictions and require schools to provide parental notice of any technology providers who will have access to educational data.

Additionally, the new law curtails Minnesota public school districts’ authority to monitor student computer activity. Tucked neatly away in Minn. Stat. § 13.32, the MGDPA’s educational data provision, is now Subdivision 14, which regulates “school-issued devices.” Specifically, absent one of the expressly identified exceptions, the law generally prohibits any school district or private technology provider with whom a district contracts from accessing or monitoring: “(1) any location-tracking feature of a school-issued device; (2) any audio or visual receiving, transmitting, or recording feature of a school-issued device; or (3) student interactions with a school-issued device, including but not limited to keystrokes and web-browsing activity.” Minn. Stat. § 13.32, subd. 14(a). The law defines “school-issued device” to mean the “hardware or software that a public educational agency or institution, acting independently or with a technology provider, provides to an individual student for that student’s dedicated personal use.” Id. at subd. 1(d). It also includes any device issued through a one-to-one program. Id.

School districts, or a private technology provider with whom they contract, may access or monitor school-issued devices only if one of the following applies:

(1) the activity is limited to a noncommercial educational purpose for instruction, technical support, or exam-proctoring by district employees, student teachers, staff contracted by a district, a vendor, or the Department of Education, and notice is provided in advance; (2) the activity is permitted under a judicial warrant; (3) the public educational agency or institution is notified or becomes aware that the device is missing or stolen; (4) the activity is necessary to respond to an imminent threat to life or safety and the access is limited to that purpose; (5) the activity is necessary to comply with federal or state law, including but not limited to section 121A.031 [relating to the separate requirement for adoption of a student bullying policy]; or (6) the activity is necessary to participate in federal or state funding programs, including but not limited to the [federal] E-Rate program.

The law further establishes a 72-hour notice requirement whenever one or more of the exceptions is met and a school district or its private technology provider lawfully surveils a student’s school-issued device. Minn. Stat. § 13.32, subd. 14(c).

These exceptions are broad and still leave schools districts with options to monitor school-issued devices when needed to respond to safety threats, online bullying, and the like. Thus, on its face, Subdivision 14 does not eliminate schools’ ability to effectively prevent or respond to safety threats. However, forms of continuous or random tracking and data mining, including the artificial intelligence software described above, likely violate this provision. At its core, Subdivision 14 requires schools, or the technology providers with whom they contract, to articulate a legitimate factual basis establishing one of the exceptions before they surveil school-issued devices for possible safety concerns.

Exactly how much Subdivision 14 limits school district authority is uncertain. As of this article, neither Minnesota state courts nor the Department of Administration has issued opinions interpreting the provision’s scope. Notably, of all places in state law, the legislature chose to incorporate the limitations of Subdivision 14 within the MGDPA. Since any individual who willfully violates the MGDPA is guilty of a criminal misdemeanor, Minn. Stat. § 13.09(a), school district officials should – ideally, with the assistance of legal counsel – thoughtfully and carefully confirm with school district legal counsel that the facts show that one or more of the law’s enumerated exceptions has been clearly met in a situation before accessing or monitoring student school-issued devices in the manners generally prohibited.

This article is intended to provide general information with commentary. It should not be relied on as legal advice. If required, legal advice regarding this topic should be obtained from district legal counsel.

Alex D. Ivan is an attorney with the law firm of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered. For more information, please contact him at (612) 337-9304 or aivan@kennedy-graven.com.

© Alex D. Ivan (2022). Used with permission.

Dr. Matthew Hillmann is the 2023 Minnesota Superintendent of the Year

0

Dr. Matt Hillmann
Superintendent
Northfield Public Schools
Minnesota Superintendent of the Year

The Minnesota Association of School Administrators (MASA) has named Dr. Matthew Hillmann, Superintendent of Northfield Public Schools, the 2023 Minnesota Superintendent of the Year. As the Minnesota honoree, Dr. Hillmann is a candidate among other state recipients for National Superintendent of the Year, to be announced during the American Association of School Administrators (AASA) National Conference on Education on February 16-18, 2023, in San Antonio, TX. Dr. Hillmann was selected for this honor by a panel of representatives from a variety of Minnesota education organizations. Nominees are evaluated on how each candidate demonstrates leadership for learning, communication skills, professionalism, and community involvement.

Dr. Hillmann has been the Superintendent of Northfield Public Schools since 2016. Before the superintendency, he served as the Director of Administrative Services and Director of Human Resources and Technology. Dr. Hillmann started his career as a computer education teacher and technology coordinator with Madelia Public Schools and served as a technology coordinator, dean, and principal with Belle Plaine Public Schools.

Under Dr. Hillmann’s leadership, Northfield Public Schools has worked to close achievement gaps, specifically between students of color, white students, and students of different socioeconomic levels. A priority is to eliminate these gaps before students enter the K-12 system. Northfield Public Schools has addressed these gaps in three areas: strengthening and expanding district childcare and preschool programs, intentional collaboration with community preschools and childcare programs, and supporting parents seeking services for their preschool-age children.

From 2018 through 2020, all students, students qualifying for free/reduced-price lunches, and Hispanic students in the district experienced an increase in the percentage deemed “ready for Kindergarten” based on the STAR reading and initial MAP assessments. In 2021, 100% of incoming Kindergarten students who attended the district’s Early Ventures licensed childcare center, and 95% of Hand in Hand Preschool children were “ready for Kindergarten,” as identified by the Minnesota Department of Education’s approved assessment. Additionally, five years ago, Dr. Hillmann began the “Happy Birth Day” program, where he sends a handwritten card to every infant born within the district. This card begins the relationship with the district and families, and invites them to attend a free Early Childhood Family Education class.

With a focus on reading, the district’s Grade 3 students have been continuously improving proficiency in reading on the MCA-III during 2017-2019 from 56.9% to 68.3%. Despite a regression during the pandemic, Northfield Public Schools was identified by the Campaign for Grade-Level Reading as a 2021 Bright Spot Community for its response to the COVID-9 pandemic. Only 54 communities were recognized across the United States and Northfield was the only one in Minnesota to be identified.

During his tenure, Dr. Hillmann has developed a “cascading communication” strategy to promote aligning the district’s vision and operations across the community. This cascading communication involves regularly distributing key messages across multiple modalities. The positive impacts of this communication strategy are illustrated in a recent district survey where 88% of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that “The superintendent uses a variety of methods to promote effective communication throughout the district” and 84% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that “I have a clear understanding of the mission and goals of my school district.”

Dr. Hillmann and his leadership team work to amplify the voices of traditionally marginalized segments of their community through representation from diverse communities on advisory committees such as the American Indian Parent Advisory Committee and the Hispanic Parent Advisory Committee. Dr. Hillmann’s commitment to marginalized segments of his community is evidenced by his selection as the City of Northfield’s 2022 Human Rights Award recipient. Members of the district’s Hispanic Parent Advisory Committee nominated Dr. Hillmann for the award.

“Dr. Hillmann has quickly emerged as a fierce leader and advocate for equity and student achievement not only within his district but also across the entire state,” said MASA Executive Director Dr. Deb Henton. “If you ever have the opportunity to work with Dr. Hillmann you will quickly learn that his top priority is the well-being and success of all students and families. We are proud to have Dr. Hillmann represent our administrators as Minnesota’s 2023 Superintendent of the Year.”

Dr. Hillmann is an active member of MASA and the American Association of School Administrators (AASA). He has served on the MASA Board of Directors, Excellence and Equity in Education Steering Committee, and currently is the MASA President. Dr. Hillmann is also a member of Schools for Equity in Education. Dr. Hillmann has participated in AASA’s Aspiring Superintendent’s Academy and the National Superintendent Certification Program. He is a graduate of the 2016-17 MASA Great Start Cohort for New Administrators.

Dr. Hillmann is active within his community. His involvement includes the Northfield Rotary Club, Northfield Area Chamber of Commerce and the Board of Directors, Northfield Growing Local Leaders Program, and the Northfield Racial and Ethnic Equity Collaborative.

Dr. Hillmann has received a number of awards throughout his career including MASA’s 2022 Region 1 Administrator of Excellence Award, City of Northfield’s 2022 Human Rights Award, 2020 Northfield Area Chamber of Commerce “Chamber Champion” Award, 2015 MASA Outstanding Central Office Leader of the Year Award, the 2006 Minnesota State University, Mankato Outstanding Young Alumni Award, and the 2001 TIES Outstanding Technology Leader Award.

Dr. Hillmann earned a doctorate in Educational Leadership, master’s degree in Education Technology, and a specialist degree in Education Administration from Minnesota State University, Mankato. He received a bachelor’s degree in History from St. John’s University (NY).

The Minnesota Superintendent of the Year Award is sponsored by ATS&R, Planners/Architects/Engineers. Visit their website at www.atsr.com.

For more information on the AASA Superintendent of the Year Program, please visit www.aasa.org.

​MASA is a professional organization of Minnesota’s school leaders, including superintendents, assistant superintendents, directors of special education, and other central office administrators, as well as state department administrators, college, and university professors, and other educators throughout Minnesota dedicated to educational leadership for students.

###